Enerquill Advisory · Research Work with us
Screening universe › Minerals & royalty › TPL

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL · NYSE)

Minerals & royalty — HQ United States. Oil & gas valuation, proved reserves, production, break-even, net-asset-value and jurisdiction-risk screen.
Category Minerals & royaltyRegion N. AmericaCEO Tyler Glover (2016)Jurisdiction risk Low (23)

Overview

Owns ~880k acres of Permian surface plus oil & gas royalty interests and a large water services/infrastructure business; royalty production reached ~34.6 mboe/d in FY2025 with revenue of ~$0.80bn and adjusted EBITDA of ~$0.69bn at ~86% margin.

Debt-free with a net-cash balance sheet, ~69m shares and a premium multiple; an atypical M&A target given S&P 500 membership, no capex burden and structurally high ROACE, but concentrated entirely in the Permian Basin.

Valuation snapshot (FY2025)

Market cap
$28.9bn
Enterprise value
$28.8bn
EV / EBITDA
41.9x
P / E
60.1x
FCF yield
1.7%
Dividend yield
0.6%
ROACE
28%
Debt / equity
1%
Net debt / EBITDA
-0.2x
EV / reserves
$240.00/boe
EV / flowing
$832k/boe/d
Free cash flow
$0.5bn

Its EV/EBITDA of 41.9x is above the 5.9x median across the 142-company universe, the free-cash-flow yield of 1.7% is lower than the 6.5% median, and at $240.00/boe of proved reserves it is richer than the $13.51/boe median.

On a balanced screen across the universe, Texas Pacific Land Corporation scores 49/100, strongest on asset quality (74/100). Sub-scores: value 9, quality 74, growth 73, risk 35 (higher = riskier).

Reserves & production

Texas Pacific Land Corporation holds approximately 0.12 billion boe of proved (1P) reserves with FY2025 production of about 35 thousand boe/d (69% liquids), a reserve life of roughly 9.5 years. Break-even: n/a (royalty + surface + water model) — land/royalty/water; no drilling capex; economics driven by Permian activity on its acreage

Net asset value (public-source)

For Texas Pacific Land Corporation, no SEC standardized measure is disclosed (non-US filer or listed NOC), so a public-source proved-NAV floor is not computable from US filings. See the interactive screener's NAV tab for peers where an SEC figure exists.

Jurisdiction risk · production-weighted country risk

23 /100
Low jurisdiction risk
Production-weighted average of the country scores below (0 = safest, 100 = riskiest).
Country / regionProd. shareCountry riskKey jurisdiction risk
United States100%23Stable, deep; federal-lands leasing and permitting policy swings.
How this is scored. Each country's risk (0–100) is anchored to two named public indices — the OECD Country Risk Classification (0–7 official export-credit country risk) and the World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators (Political Stability & Absence of Violence percentile) — blended 55/45 and rescaled to 0–100. A company's jurisdiction risk is the production-weighted average across the countries where it operates. This is a pure country measure, kept separate from company & financial risk (leverage, governance). Source: OECD Country Risk Classification (CRC) as of 24 July 2025, sourced via the German Federal Export Credit Guarantees (exportkreditgarantien.de) which applies the OECD consensus country risk category directly (values 0-7; 0 = lowest risk). High-income OECD members are not individually rated by the OECD and are set to crc=0 per the model spec (US, UK, Norway, Canada, Australia, Japan, NZ, and most of Europe incl. OECD members Israel, Poland, Hungary, Czechia, Lithuania, Ireland). 'ps' = World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) 'Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism' percentile rank, latest available (2023 vintage), 0-100 with higher = more stable; ps values are best sourced estimates rounded to the WGI percentile scale. Yemen not on OECD list ('./.') so crc estimated at 7. Iraq-Kurdistan and Falklands are non-standard model rows using judgment, not official OECD entries..

Need this for a live deal on TPL?

Enerquill Advisory provides asset valuation, petroleum fiscal modelling and risk analysis for oil, gas and LNG transactions — including bespoke, deal-specific NAV and acquirer–target screens that go well beyond this public data.

Work with us →About Enerquill

Key assets & projects

AssetLocationTypeNotes
Land & Resource ManagementUnited StatesOil & gas royaltyroyalty interest across ~880k surface acres; core cash engine tied to Permian drilling/completion activity
Land & Resource ManagementUnited StatesSurface leases / easementsrevenue from pipeline, road, facility and other surface-use easements on owned acreage
Water Services & OperationsUnited StatesWater sourcing/salessale of sourced and treated water to E&P operators; ~$0.17bn FY2025 water sales
Water Services & OperationsUnited StatesProduced-water royaltiesroyalties on operator-disposed produced water; ~$0.12bn FY2025 revenue
Land & Resource ManagementUnited StatesLand / surface ownershipfee-simple surface acreage underpinning royalty, easement and water franchise optionality
Water Services & OperationsUnited StatesWater infrastructuregathering, disposal and treatment infrastructure supporting Permian operators
Land & Resource ManagementUnited StatesMaterials / othercaliche, aggregate sales and miscellaneous surface-related income

Five-year trend (FY2021–FY2025)

Metric20212022202320242025
Production (mboe/d)2022242735
Proved reserves (bnboe)0.080.090.100.110.12
Revenue ($bn)0.50.70.60.70.8
EBITDA ($bn)0.40.60.50.60.7
Net income ($bn)0.30.50.40.50.5
Free cash flow ($bn)0.20.40.40.50.5

Get the TPL one-page tearsheet (PDF)

Enter your email and we'll open a print-ready one-page tearsheet for Texas Pacific Land Corporation — and add you to the monthly oil & gas valuation screen.

Peer companies — Minerals & royalty

VNOM · Viper EnergyPSK · PrairieSky Royalty Ltd.TPZ · Topaz Energy Corp.BSM · Black Stone Minerals, L.P.FRU · Freehold Royalties Ltd.KRP · Kimbell Royalty Partners, LPDMLP · Dorchester Minerals, L.P.VTS · Vitesse Energy

Sources

✓ FY2025 figures verified against primary sources:

↗ Compare TPL against 141 peers in the interactive screener

Disclaimer. Screening research only — a starting point, not investment or transactional advice. Figures are drawn from public sources (~mid-2026), may contain errors, and require independent due diligence before any decision.
Enerquill Advisory. Data compiled from company FY2025 filings and results releases; market data ~mid-2026. Larger names are verified against primary sources (shown on each page); smaller names are best-estimates pending verification. © Enerquill Advisory. enerquilladvisory.com